APIAPE: Agents of Private Interest, Architects of Public Erosion

Exposé File: Fiona Lai

Fiona Lai: Appearing for the People, Acting for the Power

Policy by Facade, Governance by Extraction

Minister of Compliance · Architect of Appearances · Serving Profit in the Name of Reform

Image source: Auckland Council (circa late 2023)

Fiona Lai is not a backbencher. As Deputy Chair of the Puketāpapa Local Board and a long-time C&R candidate, her position carries influence — especially in one of Auckland’s most culturally diverse regions. Publicly portrayed as a pharmacist, local church leader, and community advocate, she trades on the language of care and representation.

But behind this image lies a deep political contradiction. Lai runs with Communities & Residents (C&R), a bloc long aligned with the National Party — known for advancing conservative, top-down governance and asset privatisation. She is also married to Carlos Cheung, a National MP who introduced the Auckland Future Fund Bill (Local Bill 118–1) — a legislative move that enables the soft sell-off of Auckland’s public assets.

This contradiction between her public persona and her political positioning is not minor. It reflects a broader strategy of using community credibility to legitimise disempowerment. Her platform says “community.” Her affiliations — and her proximity to power — say otherwise.

2. Affiliation with C&R: A Legacy of Control

C&R (Communities & Residents), historically aligned with the National Party, has long advocated for fiscal conservatism, asset privatisation, and elite-led governance. Fiona Lai’s repeated candidacy — and current Deputy Chair position — under this banner ties her to a broader political legacy that favours centralised control of public resources.

She is also married to Carlos Cheung, the National MP for Mt Roskill who introduced the Auckland Future Fund Bill (Local Bill 118–1) — a proposal that enables the transfer of Auckland Airport shares into a managed fund, with provisions that weaken public consultation and long-term community ownership.

3. The Video: Closed Messaging, Ethnic Containment

In 2022, Fiona Lai appeared in Ministry of Health videos promoting flu vaccinations — one in Cantonese, one in Mandarin. The highest-viewed of these received just 459 views over nearly three years. The videos featured no English subtitles, had comments turned off, and were never translated for wider public engagement. Rather than transparent outreach, this was targeted messaging — aimed at cultural containment, not public accountability.

4. From Pharmacy to Policy: Service Without Opposition

As a pharmacist and hospital worker, Fiona Lai brands herself as a community voice. But her governance record shows no challenge to:

5. The Cheung–Lai Alignment: A Dual Strategy

Image source: NZ Taxpayer's Union Inc.

Their dual roles raise serious ethical questions. Carlos Cheung drafts national legislation that promotes asset conversion. Fiona Lai, representing C&R at the local level, maintains credibility in the community while aligned with the very ideology being advanced at Parliament.

The Auckland Future Fund Bill — Local Bill 118–1 — enables the transfer of Auckland Airport shares into an “intergenerational fund” with minimal public input. Its approval would normalise asset conversions with no binding public referendum, no Treaty protections, and no enforceable transparency.

This isn’t just passive governance. It is managed perception — a coordinated effort where one legislates, the other legitimises. Together, they represent a well-branded political unit that aligns with elite interests while avoiding direct community confrontation.

What You Can Do

Every case documented strengthens public memory—and demands accountability.
🔙 Back to APIAPE Index